Continuing Professional Education

CPE.COM IS NOW IN ALPHA

A thought, current stock price downturn, the number of "doing business patents", and activities of the intangible properties bar? Relationship: intangible property legal fees vs stock market performance?

Your CPE resource finder:, click as indicated
              CPE providers
              Tax and accounting internet links
             Buy sell practice    Corporate research
              need a business plan format? SEC private placement rules
              Securities Broker Dealer and Register Investment Advisor
              Workmans Compensation maybe even free payroll?
              Doing corporate research?
              Non-profits, a large sector for the accounting profession
       see better OCR at here training course design software
              transportation solutions: hhld moving services Virtual, regionally distributed
              Seeking CPAs wanting to develop a practice in Electronic Bill Presentment
        great Living Trust Site - answers many questions     Maybe help with 401K?

Warehouses Internet Taxation Issues tax directory

Reminders:

A. in 1913, 2 amendments 16th) allowing income tax and 17th) people not states to elect the members of the U. S. congress, finally, enabled special interests, to avoid the checks and balances imposed by the constitutional federalist, the same, who insisted on the 1st 10 amendments (bill of rights). They told us this would happen, and now we must again amend the constitution to provide for a supermajority (like 4/5 vote ) to undue the 1912-13 mistakes as well as to unempower business over our legislatures. The legislatures are supposed to be for the people not against them.

B. The patent and other intangible property laws are impeding biotechnology research thereby killing people and hindering competition in the development of consumer education, genetics, new drugs, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals. The solution is to make unpatentable all natural products, and all technology when used for a medical reason

C. The medical license now requires graduation from a medical school; the problem is, medical schools do not teach biotechnology, molecular biology, thinking, physics, mathematics; instead they teach clinical medicine. Clinical medicine is based on experience, not science!

D. Instead of a system which limits provider access by its discriminatory admissions and selection processes, we need a national federal examination that can qualify practioners from all walks of science to practice their science in expert fashion on real people or to do human biological research. The of classifying everything that touches a human being as medicine is gone. The proposed federal examination would be void of politics since all who apply would be eligible to be examined on the same competitive basis. A school with no admissions policy, an examination with open door policy; not an examination, which seeks to excludes those, who might compete with the established practioners. It is that very lack of competition that has made medicine the 8th leading cause of death in the US. America needs qualified scientists to practice their science in human biology (not just medicine). That need for practioners extends to all who can qualify without regard to their nationality, place of residence, mode or place of learning, age or sex. If they apply to challenge the examination, the only question should be when it will be taken. I propose to call it the (Federal Practioner of Medicine License) FPML, so that modern technologies as they become available will become a part of the practice of modern human biology (parts of which constitute the practice of medicine) and so that all practioners and researchers, however trained, can practice in any of the 50 separate U.S. states without the permission of any other personal interest group.

License to practice:
SEC has issued a staff accounting Bulletin for revenue reporting guidelines
help at the SEC RodgersR@sec.gov and TaubS@sec.gov and JacobsenE@sec.gov and BaylessR@sec.gov

CPE: tinkering with it, update

The state societies of accountancy qualify selections from the body of accountancy knowledge certain materials for credit, and the CPA challenges the body of knowledge to be mastered, and the state societies as well as third provider generate study materials and tests competes to make easy, complete, relevant and interesting the mastery of that body of knowledge. But nowhere we know of is there an independent reporting service that attempts to grade and compare the different courses. CPE.com intends to challenge the creative presentation skills of the different providers and to encourage them to create courses and materials that serve the relevant and timely needs of the busy CPA.

Our newsletter to the CPA will concentrate on course material qualities, presentation creativity, content competencies and overall educational skills. It will cover course materials and attempt to fairly compare one course to another.

We are independent with respect to our opinions about the course materials as we have no course materials to offer the CPA, we do not authorize credit for the courses, and we are not owned or capitalized by any of the providers whose products we report on; however we do charge providers for services we render to them because they are our clients.

CPE.com is well positioned to become the watch dog for quality in CPE for the CPA. We intend to offer each provider our internet knowledge, the use of our internet resources to deliver their materials, access to certain marketing services, and educational or cirriculum design consulting services. We will conduct feedback opinion polls from CPAs. We will attempt to identify and announce specific courses and materials in prerelease that might be particularly timely. From time to time we hope to offer non-monetary awards for outstanding courses, writers, and producers.

CPE.com feels that many materials essential to the practice of accounting have been made freely available on the Internet. CPE.com shall make every effort to place on its pages, links to such free materials as government regulations, tax forms, federal register posting, computer software, and notices of importance to those CPAs advising certain industries. This site will be designed to provide for the information needs of the CPA. It is intended that those who support the profession of accounting will support cpe.com and the concepts embodied here. .

Tax Regulations - IRS Rev. Proc.99-10 prt deposit penalty release Internet Tax Issues Enrolled Agent
efile application publication 3112 citizen advocacy Panel Criminal emphasis on Tax Shelter Investigations
new:political orgs red to file: form8871 tax problems of protesters

Fed Government Laws, Regs, and great info GPO nearly all of it

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY U.S. CUSTOMS SERVICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR pay electronically

Other Links for you to click on. These links suggest the helpful intent of this page:

http://www.ficpa.org/ FICPA Link to Florida DBPR

state tax resources (listed by state) Ca_link to tax questions answered

Accounting societies, listed by state

http://www.aicpa.org/ AICPA

http://cyber-cpa.com/ answers to your questions?
more cpe courses

if you would like to know more, or if you have a comment about the ideas and comments embodied herein please email me info@thelinks.com

this tax and accounting professional resource site does not provide accounting, tax, or legal advise, nor does it recommend, approve or suggest advise or information locatedat sites hyperlinked from cpe.com.

PLEASE COME BACK SOON!